January 28 - London 2012 chairman Sebastian Coe and Hugh Robertson (pictured left), the Sport and Olympics Minister, have both written to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to express their support for the British Olympic Association's lifetime bans for drug cheats.

CAS are due to hear the BOA's appeal against the World Anti-Doping Authority's (WADA) decision to declare the British ban "non-compliant" with its anti-doping code in London on March 12.

If the appeal is rejected the sprinter Dwain Chambers and cyclist David Millar will be able to eligible in this summer's Games.

Both are subject to life-time Olympic bans, under a BOA by-law that bars any athlete who has served a doping ban from selection for any British Olympic team.

Coe is a long-time campaigner against drugs in sport.

"I have written a supportive letter from a personal perspective of somebody who has a long and fairly robust history, and an unreconstructed history some might say, on this," Coe said.

"It is a personal view."

Coe's backing will be a big boost to the campaign being led by Colin Moynihan, the chairman of the BOA, who are now the only National Olympic Committee (NOC) to have a lifetime ban in place for drugs cheat.

Robertson, meanwhile, has written a letter backing the BOA's right to select its own team without outside interference.

"It remains this Government's policy to support a lifetime ban for drugs cheats," he said.

By Duncan Mackay

Source: www.insidethegames.biz


Please follow this link to view the WADA list of prohibited substances 2010 : icon WADA 2009 Code

December 2 - Science alone is no longer enough to catch all drug cheats, a leading figure in the fight against doping in sport has admitted.

In a sobering resume of the balance of forces in this high-profile battle in the run-up to the London 2012 Olympic Games, David Howman (pictured), director general of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) told the Partnership for Clean Competition Conference in New York: "We all should know by now that the fight against doping in sport has reached the stage where science alone will not eradicate cheating or often even detect it.

"Sample collection and analysis is getting more expensive.

"The rules appear to some to be getting more complicated.

"Laboratory directors and scientists in general continue to be conservative.

"Indeed, it may be suggested that some err in favour of not returning adverse results for fear of the legal process and the time required to give evidence under attack."

Scientists, he argued, in general did not enjoy "the adversarial approach of lawyers".

Meanwhile, the "clever cheating athlete" was becoming "better at cheating, more sophisticated and funded extensively".

That athlete, he said, "might now be confidently of the view that he or she will avoid detection under the historical approach".

He went on: "From micro dosing to manipulation, the clever doper, aided, abetted and considerably financed by clever entourage members, continues to evade detection through the analytical process.

"And we continue to be haunted by the impunity with which, for example, many treat human growth hormone."

Howman asserted that cost was being used as "an excuse" by those responsible for anti-doping programmes not to undertake the best possible approach.

"For example, not all samples are analysed for erythropoietin (EPO).

"With only 36 positive cases for EPO being found in 2010, from 258,000 samples surely indicates that."

The sport industry, he said, was now estimated to be a $800 billion (£510 billion/€594 billion) a year business.

"Spending $300 million (£191 million/€223 million) to protect the integrity of such a business does not seem to be an awful amount of money."

What, he asked rhetorically, was the real prevalence of doping?

"Analytical findings suggest about 1-2 per cent, but recent studies suggest double digits," he said.

To deal with the current situation, Howman argued, investigations needed to form "an integral part" of any effective anti-doping programme.

He disclosed that a new document had now been sent to all anti-doping organisations worldwide including "good, practical, sensible suggestions" on how to go about working with law enforcement, customs, immigration and other officials "in order to properly and appropriately share information".

He also urged his audience to "realise that, in most cases, it is not athletes acting alone who defeat everything for which they should stand.

"They are assisted, counselled, sometimes tricked and occasionally forced into the downward spiral of cheating."

He acknowledged that "we still do not really have an appropriate and consistent way of ensuring that the athlete entourage, when responsible for aiding and abetting, persuading and supplying, can be sanctioned.

"We must continue to search for ways and means of globally achieving this."

By David Owen

Source: www.insidethegames.biz

World Anti-Doping Agency

October 6 - The British Olympic Association's (BOA) chairman Colin Moynihan today put up a strong defence of his organisation's bylaw preventing athletes found guilty of a doping violation from taking part in any British Olympic team, pledging to do "everything in my power" to keep it in place.

Moynihan moved quickly to clarify the BOA's position in light of this morning's decision by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to rule that the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) rule 45, which banned any athlete serving a suspension of six months or more for doping violations from the subsequent Olympic Games, was "invalid and unenforceable".

The decision in Lausanne raised the prospect of the likes of Dwain Chambers, the British sprinter banned from participating in London 2012 for his use of a cocktail of banned drugs in 2003, taking an appeal to CAS to win the right to represent Britain.

"[The bylaw] is tough but fair," Moynihan told the press conference here at the BOA headquarters here this afternoon.

"The bylaw has stood the test of time for 20 years."

Moynihan contended that whereas the IOC rule 45 stipulated a further sanction on an athlete testing positive for an illegal substance, the BOA rule addresses their eligibility instead.

The IOC had argued a similar point when taking the case to CAS.

The BOA believe they are on strong ground regardless, as Moynihan insisted that they have a written endorsement from 2009 confirming that the bylaw conforms with the World Anti-Doping Code, something he says the IOC did not have.

Moynihan said that they would be writing to the IOC for reassurance of their autonomy to select the team they see fit for Olympic Games.

His stance was supported by Sarah Winckless (pictured), the Athens 2004 bronze medal winning rower, who is the BOA's Athletes' Commission chair.

"This law came in in 1992 and the overwhelming support for it is 90 per cent among athletes every time we ask," she said.

"We want a clean team and a clean sport.

"I've always been proud to line up with athletes I know are clean."

Even Britain's Sport and Olympics minister Hugh Robertson has stepped in to defend the BOA's stance on the matter.

"I have always supported the BOA ban, crucially 95 per cent of our athletes support the BOA ban and believe it is different from the IOC bylaw because inside that ban is a right of appeal which is not there with the IOC," he said today at the Leaders in Football conference in London.

"I spend a lot of time these days with our Olympics teams and if you ask any of them what their view is, they will absolutely, every man and woman, back that ban.

"Olympic athletes do not want people convicted of doping offences back in their sport.

"It is very clear and I absolutely support the BOA case."

Moynihan further defended the BOA position amid increasing pressure, notably from Travis Tygart, chief executive of the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), who earlier this week called on them to scrap the bylaw.

"I don't believe our position is isolated," Moynihan said.

"One of the findings this morning was for the IOC to consider taking this forward and maybe embed rule 45 into the WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) Code.

"You need to focus on the rights of athletes denied the right to compete.

"In sport there is nothing more important than to be clean, I think it's essential that we send a message.

"A tough sanction needs to be applied in the rarest of circumstances, i.e. where someone intentionally denies someone who maybe spent 20 to 25 years working for a place at an Olympic Games of their place."

"That is unacceptable and for which there is no place on the Olympic team.

"I will do everything in my power to make sure [the] eligibility bylaw stays in place with the support of athletes."

-David Gold



Cartan Global         Michael Johnson Performance